- Humanoid robot revenue share varies dramatically among listed firms: Unitree's humanoid robots exceeded 50% of total revenue in 2025, while supply-chain giant Topband's robot actuator business accounted for just 0.046%.
- Profitability remains elusive for most: Unitree posted 278 million yuan net profit on 1.7 billion yuan revenue, while UBTECH reported a 703 million yuan net loss on 2 billion yuan revenue in the same year.
- Regulators are tightening IPO scrutiny for humanoid robot companies, requiring revenue to be real, sustained and replicable, with losses and profitability prospects subject to rigorous questioning.
- Family robot makers Ecovacs and Roborock demonstrate the highest commercial maturity with billions in profit, but diverging trajectories show that scale alone does not guarantee profit growth.
- The shift in evaluation standards signals that China's robot industry is transitioning from concept-driven valuations toward delivery efficiency, cost control and customer repurchase as competitive differentiators.
Revenue Disclosure Marks a New Phase
For the first time, multiple Chinese robot companies are breaking out humanoid robot revenue in public filings, providing a quantitative measure of how far commercialization has progressed. Unitree Technology, which listed on Shanghai's STAR Market, disclosed that humanoid robots contributed approximately 868 million yuan of its 1.699 billion yuan revenue in 2025, representing about 51.1% of total sales. UBTECH Robotics reported that full-size embodied intelligent humanoid robot products and solutions generated roughly 821 million yuan in 2025, or about 41% of revenue, rising to 46.5% in the first half of 2026.
Dobot, a collaborative robot maker, showed an earlier stage of this transition: its embodied intelligent robot segment contributed only 4.1% of revenue in 2025 but grew to 14.3% in the first half of 2026, even as six-axis collaborative robots still accounted for 62.2% of sales. The act of separately disclosing humanoid robot revenue itself signals that capital market evaluation has shifted from product announcements and partnership signings to auditable financial metrics.
Supply Chain Firms Show Vastly Different Exposure
Companies entering the robot supply chain from larger existing businesses illustrate the gap between being labeled a robot stock and actually deriving material revenue from robotics. Topband Group, an auto parts manufacturer with nearly 30 billion yuan in annual revenue, reported robot actuator income of approximately 13.59 million yuan in 2025, representing just 0.046% of total sales. Entering a supply chain, securing design wins, receiving orders and recognizing scaled revenue are distinct stages that financial disclosures now make distinguishable.
Component specialists occupy a middle ground. Leaderdrive, a harmonic reducer maker, posted about 571 million yuan in revenue and 124 million yuan in net profit with positive operating cash flow in 2025. However, these earnings include contributions from legacy industrial customers and cannot be attributed entirely to new-generation embodied robot demand. The Qbitai analysis emphasizes that entering the supply chain and forming scalable revenue remain fundamentally different milestones.
Profitability Remains the Exception, Not the Rule
Among whole-machine companies, profit and loss tables have begun to diverge sharply. Unitree reported 2025 net profit attributable to shareholders of approximately 278 million yuan with operating cash inflow of 670 million yuan. In contrast, UBTECH recorded a net loss of about 703 million yuan with operating cash outflow of 784 million yuan, despite comparable revenue scale. Dobot also remained unprofitable with a net loss of roughly 84 million yuan.
Geek+, a warehouse robotics firm, illustrates the complexity of assessing profitability: it reported adjusted net profit of about 43.82 million yuan on 3.171 billion yuan in 2025 revenue, but under standard accounting rules still posted a net loss of approximately 10.41 million yuan. In the first half of 2026, its adjusted net loss widened to about 60.6 million yuan. Among established industrial robot makers, Siasun reported a 398 million yuan net loss on 4.122 billion yuan in revenue yet generated positive operating cash flow of 161 million yuan, demonstrating that losses and cash generation can coexist depending on project settlement timing.
Family Robots Offer the Most Mature Benchmark
Household robot companies provide the clearest evidence of scaled commercialization. Ecovacs reported 2025 revenue of approximately 19.04 billion yuan with net profit of 1.758 billion yuan and operating cash inflow of 3.387 billion yuan. Roborock posted similar revenue of about 18.695 billion yuan and net profit of 1.363 billion yuan. Yet their trajectories diverged: Ecovacs' net profit surged 118.1% year-on-year while Roborock's declined 31.0% despite 56.5% revenue growth, showing that scale does not automatically translate into improving margins.
The family robot sector's path through cost control, channel efficiency and after-sales service networks represents the threshold that newer embodied AI products must eventually cross. Product reliability is merely the starting point; sustainable profitability depends on operational execution across the entire value chain.
Tighter IPO Standards Reshape Industry Incentives
Multiple investment banking sources told Cailian Press earlier in September that regulators are adjusting the listing pace for some humanoid robot companies. While no formal new rules have been published, the emerging standard requires revenue to be genuine, sustained and replicable, with loss trends and profitability prospects able to withstand regulatory questioning. Products must progress from technology demonstrations to stable customer relationships and scaled delivery.
This shift does not close the IPO window—Benmo Technology and Huanchuang Technology completed listings in late September as planned—but it changes what gets rewarded. Companies will need to demonstrate repeat purchases, unit economics, deployment efficiency and cash recovery earlier in their development cycles. If this screening logic persists, valuation premiums attached to the robot label may gradually converge, and competition will increasingly turn on replicable delivery capability, cost management and customer retention rather than demonstration videos and one-off project contracts.
Sources & context
Go to the original material. Company claims remain attributed to their sources.
01
